Hydragenic has a post inspired by quote from that old standby “Robert M Pirsig’s 1974 masterpiece Zen And The Art Of Motorcycle Maintenance,” in which the idea that an expansion (or, rather, deepening) of knowledge brings about greater distances between individuals and so frays the fabric, or the common thread, of community.
If I understand it right, Hydragenic looks at this quote in the terms of the challenges that face us in expressing our many selves and at the same time recognize our commonality (or is it communality?) in the increasing circles of communities we are part of as a result of the information age. I did leave a comment on his post, but alas, I don’t it registered. This is what I said:
Lots of fascinating ideas in your post to consider. Seems to me that the Internet made admittance to many communities a lot easier, lowering the bar through technology. And yet, not only do many of these communities lack depth for which they make up in “width” or linkeages), but also, maintaining them, I think, takes a lot more effort — strangely enough when one considers the ease of technology for access to them.
Indeed, I am beginning to think that some of the strains associated with all this social networking and blogging-as-conevrastions and such has to do with that lack of the “mainstream” Hydrengic refers to in his comment. Being linked to is not the same as being a member of… But then, being linked to can be measured, and that confers another type of membership in a community, such as ranking on technorati, for example.
My old blog, which I had abandoned recently, but long enough to measure in centuries in Internet terms, still ranks pretty high on technorati, only because years ago, an A-lister linked to it.
It’s only recently that I am stating to understand why I decided to stop that blog. I started it because I was in search of community, more than in search of a platform for expressing my selves. I found the community through it, but maintaining that community through that blog no longer seemed feasible.
UPDATE:
I must have been thinking of Hydragenic’s post still as I read an article on the baby-name business in today’s Wall Street Journal. This passage from the article more than supports Hydragenic’s analysis and the lengths some will go to express themselves without having to rely for understanding on a common frame of reference:
“Celebrities (think Apple Martin, Shiloh Jolie-Pitt and Pilot Inspektor Riesgraf-Lee) are helping drive up the pressure. And the growing brand consciousness among consumers has made parents more aware of how names can shape perceptions. The result: a child’s name has become an emblem of individual taste more than a reflection of family traditions or cultural values. “We live in a marketing-oriented society,” says Bruce Lansky, a former advertising executive and author of eight books on baby names, including “100,000+Baby Names.” “People who understand branding know that when you pick the right name, you’re giving your child a head start.”[emphasis added]
Not to mention the business that this branding anxiety has spawned: baby-name consultants. Like the numerologist who for $475 analyzed a name for its vibes.